On January 1st 2014, Britain opens its doors to Bulgaria
and Romania. UKIP leader Nigel Farage is
doing the rounds, telling BBC news programmes such as Question Time and The
Daily Politics that the 30million people living in those two countries will
turn up on our shores to join the 100,000plus that already live here.
Tempted by the well paid labour and our free health services, Farage
claims it is inevitable that they will flood our country, despite the fact that
they are also free to enter any other country in Europe, including Germany,
Spain, and France.
The main political parties here have done little to quash the scare mongering,
with communities and local government secretary Eric Pickles repeatedly
refusing to estimate the actual numbers we expect. 49 year old former
Conservative member Farage has relentlessly used his exaggerations about
immigration to bolster his argument that the UK should leave the EU.
A recent report from University college London’s migration research
unit, found that migrants coming to the UK since 2000 are less likely to claim
benefits or social housing than people who already lived here. The study goes
on to report that immigrants contributed £25 billion to our economy in the same
period. This bucks the popular perception the right wingers would have us believe that foreigners will come here taking all our
houses, claiming our benefits and increasing crime rates.
It is high time politicians and certain quarters of the media stopped
muddying the waters and had the grown up, honest debate about immigration that
Farage calls for, but debate based on facts, not fantasy.
UKIP and Farage deserve to be congratulated for raising the issue from
being whispered about behind closed doors, to the top of the political agenda. It
is now possible to discuss immigration without being accused of racism,
although there are still no doubt those who will have that agenda.
While it is arguable that immigrants are taking all the houses, what
is clear, is that we need more houses. The down side of immigration “what if’s”
dominating the headlines is that issues such as housing shortages, the
increasing cost of living, and precautionary measures against the threat of
terrorism get pushed down the agenda or shaped to fit the agenda.
Terror suspects such as Mohammed Ahmed Mohamed are able to disappear
by simply entering a mosque and changing into a Burka. He has been undetected
since the 1st of November. Urgent action needs to be taken on the
clearly ineffective measures we currently have in place, yet we spend time
debating whether the Burka should be banned. Someone asked on TV last week, as
terror suspects escape in taxis, should we also ban taxis?
No comments:
Post a Comment